The Sociopathic Scientist Next Door
Philosophical notes on the sociopathology of the CDC and NIH's
AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome pseudoscience.
A work in progress.
These notes are inspired by some of the trenchant ideas in Martha Stout's book The Sociopath Next Door.
We live in a sociopathic state of AIDS/CFS apartheid science that is kept in place by something that could be called a murderous, conscienceless zombie-like public health system. And it has a happy face.
The guiding hand this decades-old sociopathological pseudoscientific system belongs to Anthony Fauci.
From a structural point of view, Anthony Fauci is the Chief Scientific Sociopath of the sociopathic scientific world of CFS/AIDS apartheid and its supporting nosological, epidemiological and virological fraud. His calm at the center of a mess he has created is uncanny.
When
science becomes infused with homophobia, racism and misogyny, as it has
been in AIDS/CFS apartheid, it becomes a conscienceless
sociopathological system.
Most people do not realize when they are in the presence of a sociopath. The same holds true for sociopathic science. Sociopathic science wears a mask of rationality and credibility.
One can not truly understand what has occurred under the guise of "AIDS" and "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome" without a firm grasp of the nature of sociopathic science and medicine.
Sociopaths don't announce to the world that they are sociopaths. Neither does sociopathic science.
A philosophy of sociopathic science needs to focus on the ways in which science can lose its "conscience." Scientific "conscience" is the referee (individual, communal and systemic) that awakens science when it is becoming unethical, unfair, elitist or downright totalitarian. The science of AIDS/CFS apartheid is all of the above. The science of AIDS/CFS apartheid is "conscienceless."
What the AIDS critics and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome activists never realized was that dealing with Anthony Fauci and the CDC was like dating a sociopath.
Giving the CDC or the NIH more money to research Chronic Fatigue Syndrome without litigating all the deceptive and dishonest pseudoresearch that has already be done is like giving a sociopath more money to be a sociopath.
The sociopathic nosology and epidemiology of AIDS/CFS is a war crime against the gay community and the Black community.
The gay and Black communities have been deceived and silenced by the sociopathic science of AIDS/CFS apartheid and, unfortunately, the bamboozled Chronic Fatigue Syndrome community has been of no help in rescuing them from their predicament.
One could say that the Age of Sociopathic Science in America began in earnest when Anthony Fauci came to power, but the groundwork had been done by the CDC.
It really shouldn't surprise anyone that a white heterosexual fraternity of nosologists and epidemiologists at the CDC would create a racist and homophobic era of sociopathic science.
Sociopathic science is the institutional and narrative throughline of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
Anthony Fauci's empire of sociopathic science could not have survived without a large army of useful scientific idiots.
Nosology and epidemiology are exquisite tools at the disposal of sociopathic science for concealing the harming of others.
Sociopathic science gave birth to the Jim Crow nosology and epidemiology of CFS/AIDS apartheid. When a handful of Black community leaders expressed concern that something was wrong with AIDS "science," they were gaslighted.
The sociopathic science that is the foundation of AIDS/CFS apartheid and the HHV-6 cover-up is the greatest source of social injustice in our time.
To talk about AIDS without talking about Chronic Fatigue Syndrome or to talk about Chronic Fatigue syndrome without talking about AIDS is to enable sociopathic science.
Sociopathic science has turned HHV-6 research and the search for a cause of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome into wild goose chases.
The republic we live in loses all of its safeguards when it is dominated by sociopathic science.
One could say that sociopathology is often hardwired into elitist nosology and epidemiology. Public health elitists use gaslighting as a common technique to fend off critical challenges to their hegemonic paradigms.
Sociopathological scientists gaslight their critics into nonpersonhood.
Before one can cure Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, one must treat the sociopathic science which has fostered its cover-up.
The sociopathological system of CFS/AIDS apartheid pseudoscience is structured to maintain Anthony Fauci's power and control.
AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome pseudoscience was a sociopathic trainwreck.
Racist and homophobic nosology and epidemiology are forms of sociopathic science.
When the AIDS epidemic began, the CDC authorities studied the gay community the way a sociopath studies its easy mark.
Sociopathic science is the corrupted hard drive of HHV-6, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and AIDS research.
When scientists work cooperatively inside of sociopathic scientific systems they become mini-sociopaths.
Sociopathic science and medicine are crimes against humanity.
Sociopathic science is capable of creating public health gulags full of clueless patsies.
The Centers for Disease Control cannot do Chronic Fatigue Syndrome research in earnest because it would expose the sociopathic science that is the foundation of AIDS research.
If the words "sociopathic science" can set up camp in the discourse on CFS and AIDS research (and activism) the whole house of cards could eventually come down.
Anyone who doesn't see that AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome are intertwined has been hoodwinked by sociopathic science.
When scientists work cooperatively inside a culture of sociopathic science like CFS/AIDS, they must become its enablers and mini-sociopaths.
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is no mystery for anyone who understands the nature of sociopathic science.
The AIDS scientific sociopaths paved the way for the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome scientific sociopaths.
All the problems in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome research stem from the fact that is part of sociopathic science's corrupt AIDS bubble.
As the AIDS research establishment's fraud and deceit is exposed, it will respond with the rage of the typical sociopath.
Fauci, the NIH and CDC have gaslighted all their AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome whistleblowers.
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients need to lose their propensity for obedience and authoritarian awe of corrupt elites if they hope to escape from the labyrinth of sociopathic science.
Anthony Fauci's empire of sociopathic science has created a world in which Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients would rather die that admit that he has successfully hidden the fact that AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome are part of the same epidemic.
There must be a massive intellectual and political intervention to dismantle the sociopathic science of CFS/AIDS apartheid. People will never see the corrupt forest for what it is if activists and scientists focus on individual trees.
Historians will never fully grasp the nature of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome without comprehending the sociopathic science that has prevented everyone from seeing what is really happening.
Sociopathic science is blinded by narcissistic bigotry and a determination to remain in control. The sociopathic science of CFS/AIDS apartheid is blinded by racism and homophobia. Because sociopathic science treats gays and blacks as "the other," it lacks the empathy to see AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome as one epidemic. In The Sociopath Next Door, Martha Stout concludes that their lives do not end well. Sociopaths in power can cause their own destruction as well as the destruction of nations. That seems to be also be the destiny of the conscience-free sociopathic science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. It apparently is no secret that one of the leading scientists involved in the sociopathic science of AIDS research now has a son with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
Epidemiology and nosology that projects us-versus-them values on epidemics and blinds the public to facts is sociopathic science.
Sociopathic science is a form of pseudoscience which is driven by a systemic political, cultural and social desire to win at all costs. It has no remorse or empathy for its victims. It hides behind a mask of sympathy. It does not care about factuality or the messy and critical process of getting to the truth. It puts itself above truth. It is a sinister act of social will posing as concern for the public good.
In describing a sociopath, Martha Stout writes, "Imagine--if you can--not having a conscience, none at all, no feeling of guilt or remorse no matter what you do, no limiting sense of concern for the well-being of strangers, friends or even family members." She could just as easily have been writing about the sociopathic science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
In terms of public health and human rights, the sociopathic science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome has been and will be as consequential as Nazi science and medicine.
If one cannot do a thought experiment and imagine science itself becoming a sociopath, one will never fully understand AIDS, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and all the diseases related to the HHV-6 pandemic.
One cannot really confront the evil of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome pseudoscience unless one realizes one is dealing with a system of science that essentially is a sociopath.
Like a true sociopath, official AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome will not respond to normal events and research that usually correct false science and bring it back to its senses.
The main constituent elements of the sociopathic science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome apartheid are homophobia and racism.
Homophobia and racism are inherently sociopathic. They treat gays and blacks as "the other," as objects to be manipulated.
AIDS epidemiology and science had gays in their crosshairs.
The other is not considered fully human, so sociopathic science can do whatever it wants with its "others." Where AIDS is concerned, that would be gays and blacks.
Sociopathic science gets away with what it does because it maintains the appearance of "science."
For the most part, gays and blacks were clueless that they were dealing with science that was and is a sociopath. This was also true for the mostly white heterosexuals who were told they suffered from "mysterious Chronic Fatigue Syndrome."
AIDS epidemiology never treated gays and blacks as fully human.
Since AIDS epidemiology was fundamentally sociopathic, it could treat gays and blacks the way a cat treats a mouse. And it did.
Sociopathic science walks and and talks like science. It is very good at its charade.
Like most marks or patsies, gays and blacks for most part did not realize they had been targeted by a sociopath called AIDS epidemiology.
White heterosexuals who had the misfortune to be swept up into the fraudulent diagnosis of "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome" were the collateral damage of the sociopathic epidemiology of AIDS which was primarily aimed at gays and blacks.
Martha Stout points out that it is common for us to assume that everyone has a conscience, but that at least four percent of the population totally lacks one. The same holds true for the average person's take on science and medicine. It is nearly impossible for most people to get their minds around the idea that science and medicine can operate without a conscience."
Matha Stout describes sociopaths as having "ice water in their veins." The CDC's AIDS and CFS science had the same ice water in its veins.
Like the "internal constraints" to doing evil which the sociopath lacks, sociopathic science also is missing the barriers that keeps it from creating great evil. It does what it wants with a devil-may-care attitude. Sociopathic science does not lose sleep over anything it does.
During the era of CFS/AIDS apartheid, sociopathic science has been a steamroller that has flattened anyone who got in its way.
Martha Stout notes that the sociopath loves to destroy those who are superior "in some way." The sociopathic science behind CFS/AIDS apartheid sociopathically destroyed many a talented scientist and intellectual. Or at least tried to. It will fall to psychological historians to sort out how much envy figured into the scientific sociopathy of the era.
People wonder why there was no internal protest coming out of the CDC and NIH during the period of CFS/AIDS apartheid. The radio silence was a symptom of the underlying sociopathy.
Sociopathic science requires savvy political action to be undermined successfully.
Stout notes that terrorism is the "ideal occupation" for a sociopath. CDC epidemiology is not a bad one either. Malice and "blood Lust" can be concealed behind the mask of "objective" public health science.
Stout argues that sociopaths are "dangerously" insane. the same could be said for the pseudoscience of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
Science and medicine are the last place one expects to find sociopathy, so they are the perfect cover.
AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome science at the CDC was the institutional equivalent of an antisocial personality disorder.
Trout notes that antisocial personality disorder consists of "failure to conform to social norms." The science of AIDS and CFS failed to conform to scientific norms. The characteristics of "deceitfulness and manipulativity" typical of the antisocial personality, according to Trout, can also be found in AIDS and CFS science. The antisocial personality's "failure to plan ahead" is reflected in precarious trajectory that AIDS and CFS was always on while trying to appear solid and normal. There is no way to plan for the train wreck that this massive fraud is careening towards. Curiously, those who have observed the various acolytes or enablers of AIDS and CFS scientific fraud, have often commented upon something which Trout describes in the antisocial personality as "irritability and aggressiveness." The elements of "reckless disregard for the safety of self and others" as well as "consistent irresponsibility" are also good fits. AIDS and CFS scientists endangered their own lives and the lives of their families and friends by their misguided actions.
Sociopathic science means never having to say you're sorry while heading over a cliff.
Sociopathic science is a social, cultural, political and scientific disorder.
The parallel to the charm and glibness Martha Stout describes in a sociopath is the constant stream of breakthrough propaganda which makes the public trust sociopathic science. The constant sense of progress makes the public and the media look the other way.
An aura of holy objectivity fools the public into bowing its head while sociopathic science picks its pocket.
Sociopathic science constantly takes the risk that someone will successfully call out its frauds. But it also knows how to gaslight its whistle blowers.
The public does not have a clue about the risks that sociopathic CDC science is taking with their health. They don't even recognize the "callousness" that Stout says is part of the constellation of sociopathy. They are egregiously harmed without realizing it.
We expect there to be some kind of good faith, a soul, at the heart of public health science and yet with sociopathic science, like the sociopath as described by Stout, there is "an empty hole in the psyche" of the scientific system in which AIDS and CFS patients are trapped.
People who sense that something is wrong with sociopathic science can't always put their finger on what is really going on. They are befuddled.
If people do realize that the science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is "off" in some way, they are usually "gaslighted," made to feel like they are crazy, or are accused of being so. That is the price they initially pay for recognizing sociopathy in a person or in science.
Martha Stout points out that it is difficult for even smart people to get their minds around the concept of a human sociopath. How much harder muts it be for people of average intelligence to see that they are trapped in a matrix of sociopathic science.
The sociopathic science that is hiding the true nature of the CFS/AIDS and HHV-6 pandemic seems to be utterly heartless and only committed to maintaining its public health hegemony.
The image of the guiltlessness of sociopathic science might even be easier to maintain than the illusion of guiltlessness of a human sociopath. Science can hide its lies under the pretense of perpetual progress. Science likes to keep people from looking backward at its messy process even when it is not sociopathic. That is, a trail of lies can be called a trail of sausage-making that the public should not pay much attention to anyway.
Science can always insist that it had good intentions because nobody ever thinks that science could possibly have bad intentions. Except of course people who lived through Nazi Germany and the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, to name two exceptions.
Stout asserts that sociopathy causes no "discomfort to the sociopath. The same could be true to those who make the trains of sociopathic science run on time.
Stout writes that sociopaths "are all too capable of mangling individual lives; and of making human society as a whole an unsafe place to be." It was ever thus in the sociopathic science of AIDS, CFS and HHV-6. Life inside a covered-up plague is a very unsafe place to be.
One could say that consciencelessness and censorship are intertwined in sociopathic science. Critical thinking normally serves and a wake-up call of conscience in science. A war against dissent and critical thinking, as there was in CFS/AIDS apartheid, was a symptom of systematic sociopathology.
Where AIDS is concerned, the psychology and sociology of sociopathic science is intertwined with the psychology and sociology of gay stigma.
Anyone who thinks that when the CDC's mostly white male heterosexuals constructed the epidemiological paradigm of AIDS they were being objective about the gay community and the epidemic is sadly mistaken. They do not understand how hegemonic heterosexuality rolls and the degree to which public health science is infused with it.
The scientists who created the AIDS paradigm and kept Chronic Fatigue Syndrome at a distance from it did not leave their sexual and racial identity in the parking lot of the CDC.
Gays were "the other" to the white heterosexual male epidemiologists who created the epidemiological paradigm of AIDS which was both a Potemkin Village and a hell on earth.
The CDC may have declared its love for the gay community but to the close observer it was more like slumming. Sexual and biomedical slumming.
It is hard not to assume that the ideation that was at work in the early AIDS nosology and epidemiology was free of "distancing" and "stigma."
The CDC's term "AIDS risk group" was just a polite way of saying "faggot," "queer," or "nigger." The people called the "AIDS risk group" didn't realize that they were being epidemiologically mocked.
The militant idea that what the CDC scientists saw in AIDS could not affect them is what gave the age of sociopathic scientific fraud its determination to win at all costs. To let go of that lie would have caused an institutional nervous breakdown. Like the human sociopath, this sociopathic system needed a constant flow of lies to protect previous lies. That is what made AIDS and CFS look so much like a Ponzi scheme.
Like the human sociopath, what was missing from the sociopathic science of AIDS and CFS was what Martha Stout describes as "an intervening sense of obligation based on emotional attachments--including most especially love, compassion and tenderness."
One could say that the CDC epidemiologists created an AIDS and CFS paradigms based on their singular concern for themselves and their medical and social safety and self-esteem.
Sociopathic science is the glue that held AIDS and CFS fraud together.
The Centers for Disease Control is the perfect place for sociopathic science to blossom because it is the last place most people expect to find it.
Consciencelessness in science is reflected in a belligerent refusal to listen to the internal warnings that normally bring science back to its senses: new information, challenging data, possible new paradigms, anomalies, surprises, etc.
Martha Stout notes that conscience "blows whistles against institutions when lives are endangered." Sociopathic science creates the white noise that makes the sound of those whistles disappear.
According to Martha Stout, a sociopath has the ability to hide the "emptiness of his heart--and to command the passive silence of those who do know." There are more than a few people in AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome research who have come face-to-face with the empty heart of sociopathic science and entered into the realm of "passive silence."
The science of AIDS has always maintained appearances. It always looks like it is making progress because those in control of it also control the flow of information without having to answer to a skeptical or critical press. Negative information rarely gets published in science in general. Experiments are not regularly subjected to replication and when things are not replicated, they don't often result in publication. This works to the benefit of the sociopathic science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. There was not a more confidant face for all of this than that of Tony Fauci.
Martha Stout writes that the sociopath is "brilliant at winning. He can dominate. He can bind others to his will." This is totally true of The sociopathic science of AIDS with Anthony Fauci at its helm.
According to Martha Stout, the sociopath can cause "otherwise sophisticated people to jump and then laugh at them behind their backs." The list of sophisticated people who have jumped when they come face-to-face with the sociopathic science of the CDC, Tony Fauci and Bob Gallo is painfully long. And the laughter was shared by the sociopathic AIDS activists who acted as the storm troopers and street thugs for the sociopathic science of AIDS.
Like a true sociopath, as described by Martha Stout, the sociopathic science of AIDS and CFS could "frighten people" and "ruin a career." People don't realize that sociopathic science is playing games with them.
About the sociopath, Stout points out that "Strategies and payoffs are the only thrill he knows . . . and he has spent his entire life getting better at the game." It was ever thus for Anthony Fauci and the sociopathic AIDS and CFS science he fostered.
Martha Stout describes a sociopath as someone who treats others as "nothing more than game pieces, to be moved about, used as shields, or ejected." That's all gays and blacks ultimately were in the world of sociopathic AIDS/CFS science: game pieces.
A sociopath often has murder in his heart. You could say that the epidemiology that produced the AIDS paradigm and excluded Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, had a kind murder in its heart. Epidemiology can easily become murderous without anyone realizing what is going on. She writes, "Perhaps the ultimate in dominating another person is to take another life." Epidemiology can do much broader and deeper damage. It can take the lives of entire communities of people.
Anyone who has stared into the abyss of the sociopathic science that constitutes AIDS and Chronic Fatigue pseudoscience knows what Martha Stout means when she writes, "We are all shaken to our core by the knowledge that in our midst there are sociopathic monsters who can kill without passion or remorse."
Concealment is very important for sociopathic people and sociopathic science. Stout notes that human sociopaths "can remain unidentified for long periods of time."
Every sociopathic deception about Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is connected to a sociopathic deception about AIDS.
Sociopathic science knows how to game research and public health by quashing dissent, ignoring challenges to its logic, and promoting propaganda. It understands the levers of power in science.
Martha Stout notes, "It seems to us the ultimate injustice that a person could be evil, by our assessment, and still feel fine about itself." Sociopathic science always feels hunky-dory.
In many ways even nonsociopathic science is wired to never have to have qualms about things that go wrong because it just keeps moving. Sociopathic science takes advantage of this appearance of always moving forward to keep people from questioning its actions or motives. Science comes with a kind of built-in plausible deniability that is very useful for sociopathology. But frankly, AIDS and CFS fraud was anything but an honest mistake. It was always malice-infused. Sociopathic science is much like the human sociopaths described by Martha Stout who are "infamous for their refusal to acknowledge responsibility for the decisions they make or for the outcomes of their decisions."
Peel away the propagandistic surface of AIDS epidemiology and research and you will find what Martha Stout calls the "outrageous" logic of the sociopath.
Martha Stout tells us that when one tries to peer into the sociopath, one is looking into emptiness. The same could be said for AIDS and CFS science as conducted by the CDC. There is no there there.
Some very awesome people with consciences tried to take on the sociopathic science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome but they had to be destroyed because as Martha Stout notes, "What sociopaths envy, and may seek to destroy as part of the game is usually something in the character of a person with conscience and strong characters are often specifically targeted by sociopaths."
People with weak characters who are easily influenced make the perfect useful idiots for sociopathic science.
.
Homophobia and racism drove the sociopathic science of AIDS and CFS, but its consequences were not limited to gay and blacks.
White heterosexuals were the collateral damage of the homophobic and racist sociopathic science of AIDS and CFS.
There is no real empathetic heart beating with love for the gay and black victims of the sociopathic science of AIDS and CFS.
One could say that sociopathic science has a blood lust for doing nosology and epidemiology on outsiders, pariahs, others, minorities, the folks on the other side of the tracks.
Paradigm shifts in nonsociopathic science are supposed to be fun and exhilarating. Paradigm shifts out of sociopathic science are bloody and anything but fun.
Martha Stout asserts that sociopaths treat others as "its." The gay and black communities became the "its" of the Fauci/NIH/CDC empire of sociopathic science. Whatever modicum of conscience presence in the architects of the sociopathic science of AIDS and CFS was directed at their own friends and families. And sometimes not even them They put the whole world at risk, family and friends included.
When you are the target of a sociopath, according to Martha Stout, "You are excluded from my moral universe and with impunity--and maybe even praise from others in my group--I can drive you from your home, or shoot your family, or burn you alive." Sociopathic epidemiology allows a majority to bestow pariah status on a a minority group and inflect them medically with what could be called "Iatrogenocide."
Martha Stout warns that when sociopaths rule, the conscience of society can fall "into a profound trance" until brave, aware and moral leaders awaken people to their better senses. Unfotunately, the sociopathic science of AIDS and CFS was not successfully challenged by such leadership.
Sociopathic science was used to craft an epidemiological message that Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is not part of the AIDS epidemic.
Martha Stout writes that when sociopathological beliefs takes over a society, the results can be disastrous: "Once these beliefs have been disseminated, crushing the 'its" without pity or conscience can, with chilling ease, become an incontrovertible mandate." The beauty of the AIDS paradigm is that the "its" don't have a clue they are being hoodwinked and treated as "its."
Gays became the risk group "its" of the sociopathic science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. they got no help or critical thinking from the public. Something Martha Stout writes about sociopathology applies here: "One explanation is our trance-like state, which lets us believe the ones who are dying are only its anyway."
Sociopathological science has turned Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients into "stigma beneficiaries" of the anti-gay, Jim Crow epidemiology of AIDS. Their health may be have been seriously neglected, but at least they were not caught up in he CDC's AIDS risk group dragnet. They were in hell without a scarlet letter.
When scientific authority becomes sociopathic, we are in dire straits because, as Martha Stout points out, "we are programmed to obey authority even against our own consciences."
The sociopathic science of AIDS and CFS is able to hide behind the mask of legitimate authority created by Fauci and the CDC.
Science is often a very authoritarian culture posing as a very unauthoritarian one. Especially when it is sociopathic.
Science's sociopathic potential for fascism hides behind the appearance of a democratic process that is often anything but democratic. That science supposedly plays by the rules is the cover story for something that can be far more complicated and sinister.
In her book on sociopathology, Martha Stout writes that authority can "dull conscience." Sociopathic science has an uncanny ability to wield its authority to "dull conscience."
Sociopathic CDC AIDS science had to construct a series of risk groups of "its" to conceal the real epidemic that included what they almost facetiously referred to as "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome."
AIDS propaganda prevented the gay and black communities from seeing that they were victims of sociopathic science.
The separation of the AIDS and Chronic fatigue Syndrome epidemics was one of American science's most sociopathic enterprises.
The gay and Black communities did not have a clue that AIDS science was actually a sociopathic war of fraud being waged against them.
Sociopathic AIDS science needs to frame itself as "good" so any criticism of it can be attacked as "evil." It has worked for decades.
Contemporary sociopathic science takes advantage of the esoteric nature of modern science to trick to distract its victims from fundamental fraud.
The treatment of the truthtellers and whistleblowers who tried to expose the fraudulent nature of the science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome resembled the treatment that the victims of what Martha Stout calls "covetous" sociopaths receive. Stout writes, "Since it is simply not possible to steal and have for oneself the most valuable possessions of another person--beauty, intelligence, success, a strong character--the covetous sociopath settles for besmirching or damaging enviable qualities in others so they will not have them either, or at least not be able to enjoy them so much." In a number of ways the people who went up against Fauci and his gang had superior intelligence and character, but Fauci had the power and knew how to game the system against his moral and intellectual betters. It will fall to historians to try and sort out all the strands of covetous sociopathology that found their way into the pseudoepidemiology and pseudoscience of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
Thee were not two different kinds of sociopathology involved in AIDS and CFS. They are intertwined.
Insofar as gays live in a heterosexist culture, it should not surprise anyone that the sociopathic epidemiology of the CDC would put them in its crosshairs. To expect otherwise now seems almost goofy. Martha Stout points out, "Retribution usually against people who have no idea that they have been targeted is the most important activity in the covetous sociopath's life. . . . Since this clandestine power game is priority number one, all of the covetous sociopath's deceitfulness and tolerance for risk are devoted to it."
Given that AIDS and CFS science are basically sociopathic, one is elated to hear from Stout that sociopaths are "self destructive." But even if the sociopathic science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ultimately implodes, decade of human carnage are its legacy.
Martha Stout basically suggests that the best sociopaths are surrounded by people who are unaware about what is going on. The same could be said for sociopathic science.
Sociopathic science can become so axiomatic that people are not aware that up has been turned into down.
Martha Stout writes, "We do not expect to see a person direct a dangerous, vicious vendetta against someone who in most cases has done nothing to hurt or offend her." We also did not expect the CDC to basically conduct an heterosexist epidemiological vendetta against the gay and black communities in their hour of need.
Homophobia and racism are inherently sociopathic. Homophobic and racist epidemiology is inherently sociopathic.
Martha Stout describes a sociopath as someone who "has been slighted by nature, circumstances, and destiny, and . . . diminishing other people is [his or her] only means of being powerful." In some ways you could say that lowbrow and not very important CDC epidemiologists and scientists who got engaged in the AIDS epidemic came in contact with people in need who were in many ways their betters and that may have created the desire to diminish them with all the tricks in the arsenal of pseudoepidemiology and pseudoscience.
Gays and blacks didn't have a clue that they were being sociopathologically targeted by epidemiological retribution.
Martha Stout discusses the "gratuitous meanness' of sociopaths in her book. Anyone who came in touch with the entrenched AIDS elite notices that about them too. There was also a "gratuitous meanness" in the AIDS activist leadership. CFS patients also noticed it in their encounters with the CDC.
Stout writes that the "true nature" of a sociopath "is usually invisible to the group." It is totally the case with sociopathic science. She says that the sociopath is "a wolf in sheep's clothing" and what they do is "an extravagant charade." This describes AIDS pseudoscience perfectly. Science that is sociopathic looks normal but is anything but.
Stout asserts that sociopaths "secretly sabotage" their victims. For over three decades gays and Blacks were secretly sabotaged by AIDS sociopathic science.
Stout notes that sociopaths often use fear tactics and that is very true of the sociopathic science of AIDS and CFS. She says that sociopaths do everything they can to destroy their victims faith in themselves. Sociopathic science has an arsenal of weapons to use in browbeating its victims and making them question their ability to see the scientific truth for themselves.
Like sociopaths, who Martha Stout says have "diminishing other lives" as their primary goal. You could say that the sociopathic science of Anthony Fauci and the CDC diminished the lives of the gay and black communities. And of course, the victims often can't even tell that they are being diminished. For three decades they have played the role of totally cooperative patsies.
When someone comes face to face with sociopathic science they often doubt themselves and think, "This can't be really happening." But it is. In this way sociopathological science and actually destabilizes a persons sense of reality. Logic can disappear and in its place an Alice-in-Wonderland world of fraud has claimed the place of what once was reality.
The parallel to the charm of the human sociopath in sociopathic science is the built-in charisma of normal science which can be easily hijacked by sociopathic science.
Martha Stout says that sociopaths like to take risks. You could say that the sociopathic science of AIDS and CFS has taken risks that puts the credibility of American science and medicine in all kinds of jeopardy. The consequences could be exponential. The sociopathic science of AIDS has sucked many scientists into its vortex. Their careers are now at risk.
The sociopathic science of AIDS had a brilliant understanding of the psychological vulnerabilities of its victims.
Martha Stout asserts a human sociopath "can instantly recognize someone who is decent and trusting." In the gay and black communities the sociopathic science of Fauci and the CDC found its victims who were decent and trusting.
Martha Stout points out that a trademark of sociopaths is "crocodile tears." The sociopathic era of AIDS fraud was based in crocodile tears. Bullying crocodile tears.
Stout says the sociopaths "adopt a position of righteous indignation and anger in an attempt to stare off [the] accuser." The scientists who promoted the sociopathic science of AIDS and their activist enablers were masters of righteous indignation and anger.
Science can be a perfect mask for sociopathology. Stout writes, "conscienceless people can make full use of social and professional roles, which constitute ready-made masks that other people are loathe to look behind." People could never believe that a massive amount of fraud was coming out of the professional mouths of Fauci and the CDC.
When one thinks about the CDC's sociopathological epidemiological and scientific power, one is reminded of something Benjamin Wolman said (and Martha Stout quotes), "Usually human cruelty increases when an aggressive sociopath gains an uncanny, almost hypnotic control over numbers of people."
The sociopathological science of AIDS knew how to manipulate the propaganda levers of "credibility" and to strip it from its critics.
When sociopathological science fools a majority of people, the minority may begin to doubt their own perceptions.
People find it hard to believe that the Centers for Disease Control has been behaving like a sociopath for over 35 years.
Scientists pretend that science is inherently objective and moral. It can easily become subjective, immoral and sociopathological.
Throughout the AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome cover-up of HHV-6, science has been authoritarian and sociopathological.
Martha Stout writes, "Until recent centuries, we raised humans for whom moral outrage was an extreme luxury, and to whom the questioning of authority felt life threatening." In the socioathic world of AIDS research, questioning authority was career-threatening. And worse."
The AIDS and CFS patients have been gaslighted into not daring to challenge the sociopathic authority that they have been victimized by.
Science that will absolutely not alter itself when it is faced with contradictory evidence due to poiltics and power relationships is sociopathic.
Sociopathic AIDS pseudoscience is malevolent and malicious.
Everywhere you look in the HHV-6 cover-up you will find the sociopathological footprints of homophobia and racism.
Martha Stout writes, "To do something about shameless people, we must first identify them." Unfortunately, because sociopathic science has so many different levers of power, the public cannot even identify it as sociopathic. It just looks like normal science.
There is a great deal of pity-seeking in the AIDS era. Stout notes that sociopaths play a game in which the look for pity. The nature of the AIDS epidemic and the nature of sociopathoogy became intertwined in the arena of AIDS science and activism. Power went to the activists who hid behind he mask of pity-seeking. It is hard to believe that a group of people you are pitying are playing Machiavellian games.
Sociopathic AIDS scientists want to be pitied when they are attacked by critics who see what they are really doing. How could anybody question our honesty when we are doing such lifesaving work! We've put our own lives in danger. How dare anybody doubt us!
A sociopath, according to Martha Stout, tries "to make other people look smaller so that [he or she] can feel bigger." One could say that the heterosexist and racist male epidemiology of AIDS had the same agenda toward the gay and black communities.
Gays and blacks were victims of a white heterosexual CDC epidemiology that truly could not emotionally connect with them.
CDC AIDS pseudo-epidemiology and pseudoscience is the ultimate white heterosexual privilege.
Martha Stout writes that the sociopath transforms their life into a lie. They are capable of tormenting "the helpless for the thrill of making [his or her] colleagues look bad, and all without the slightest blip of embarrassment or accountability."
Like a human sociopath as described by Stout, sociopathic science is "deceitful, reckless, faithless and remorseless."
Science can't become sociopathic without help from some actual human sociopaths. But once the system becomes sociopathic, every element of it is supportive.
One could say that initially the CDC's AIDS science was based on a white male heterosexual "lovelessness" for gays and blacks, but as the fraudulent diagnosis of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome became necessary to cover up what they had done in AIDS, a rampant misogyny took over.
Anyone who observes the self-importance that the CDC seems to always glow with, knows that it is a very narcissistic organization. And Stout writes, "Narcissism is in a metaphorical sense one half of what sociopathy is." She also writes, "The poor narcissist cannot see past his own nose, emotionally speaking." Ditto for sociopathic science.
A lot of the first doctors and scientists involved in the AIDS epidemics saw a chance for career advancement. They were perfect recruits for sociopathic science.
Normal science is full of propagandistic charm. The public is fascinated, adoring, grateful. They make the perfect patsies when science turns sociopathic.
Sociopathic AIDS science has reigned supreme for the last 35 or so years. It is interesting that Martha Stout asserts, "Disturbingly the prevalence of sociopathy in he United Stares seems to be increasing."
Knowing that we are in the middle of an HHV-6 pandemic which infects and affects people's brains, it is fascinating that she notes that from 1976-1991, "the prevalence of antisocial personality disorder had nearly doubled among the young in America."
Stout argues that the sociopath plays a game of domination. As of now, the CDC has won it dirty game of domination against the gay and black communities. And all the victims of HHV-6 disease.
The patsies who didn't question the sociopathic AIDS science that victimized them hated the non-patsies who did question it or refused to cooperate with the authorities. This resembles what feminists called "horizontal hostility."
In her book, The Sociopath Next Door, Martha Stout urges people to get away from human sociopaths as quickly as possible. Unfortunately for the gay and black communities, there was no escape from the sociopathic epidimiology and science of he CDC and Anthony Fauci.
If science has something akin to a social contract, it is completely destroyed when it becomes sociopathological.
Without a social conscience, science can stray into the domain of pure evil.
A community of beleaguered gays who were prone, in their vulnerability, to conform to group norms, were especially susceptible to the machinations of sociopathic AIDS science and activism.
Knowing what happens in the world to human sociopaths, it should not surprise us that sociopathic science of AIDS has been so successful. Stout writes, "It would be difficult to refute the observation that people who are completely unhampered by conscience sometimes achieve power and wealth at least for a while."
Martha Stout conclude that sociopaths, big and small "most typically come to no good end. . . . In the final analysis, sociopaths appear to be a losing game, regardless of its scale." Hopefully this will be the case with the sociopathic science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
One of the most disturbing thing about human sociopaths, according to Martha Stout is that we "do not recognize them until after they damage humanity in unfathomable ways." Historians will be sorting out what sociopathic AIDS and CFS science have done to humanity for many decades.
Stout asserts that sociopaths generally "are on a downward life course" and have "failed lives." One could say that the sociopathic science of AIDS and CFS is totally failed science. It is failed science posing right now as great science.
To be continued at Sociopathic Science University . . .
Most people do not realize when they are in the presence of a sociopath. The same holds true for sociopathic science. Sociopathic science wears a mask of rationality and credibility.
One can not truly understand what has occurred under the guise of "AIDS" and "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome" without a firm grasp of the nature of sociopathic science and medicine.
Sociopaths don't announce to the world that they are sociopaths. Neither does sociopathic science.
A philosophy of sociopathic science needs to focus on the ways in which science can lose its "conscience." Scientific "conscience" is the referee (individual, communal and systemic) that awakens science when it is becoming unethical, unfair, elitist or downright totalitarian. The science of AIDS/CFS apartheid is all of the above. The science of AIDS/CFS apartheid is "conscienceless."
What the AIDS critics and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome activists never realized was that dealing with Anthony Fauci and the CDC was like dating a sociopath.
Giving the CDC or the NIH more money to research Chronic Fatigue Syndrome without litigating all the deceptive and dishonest pseudoresearch that has already be done is like giving a sociopath more money to be a sociopath.
The sociopathic nosology and epidemiology of AIDS/CFS is a war crime against the gay community and the Black community.
The gay and Black communities have been deceived and silenced by the sociopathic science of AIDS/CFS apartheid and, unfortunately, the bamboozled Chronic Fatigue Syndrome community has been of no help in rescuing them from their predicament.
One could say that the Age of Sociopathic Science in America began in earnest when Anthony Fauci came to power, but the groundwork had been done by the CDC.
It really shouldn't surprise anyone that a white heterosexual fraternity of nosologists and epidemiologists at the CDC would create a racist and homophobic era of sociopathic science.
Sociopathic science is the institutional and narrative throughline of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
Anthony Fauci's empire of sociopathic science could not have survived without a large army of useful scientific idiots.
Nosology and epidemiology are exquisite tools at the disposal of sociopathic science for concealing the harming of others.
Sociopathic science gave birth to the Jim Crow nosology and epidemiology of CFS/AIDS apartheid. When a handful of Black community leaders expressed concern that something was wrong with AIDS "science," they were gaslighted.
The sociopathic science that is the foundation of AIDS/CFS apartheid and the HHV-6 cover-up is the greatest source of social injustice in our time.
To talk about AIDS without talking about Chronic Fatigue Syndrome or to talk about Chronic Fatigue syndrome without talking about AIDS is to enable sociopathic science.
Sociopathic science has turned HHV-6 research and the search for a cause of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome into wild goose chases.
The republic we live in loses all of its safeguards when it is dominated by sociopathic science.
One could say that sociopathology is often hardwired into elitist nosology and epidemiology. Public health elitists use gaslighting as a common technique to fend off critical challenges to their hegemonic paradigms.
Sociopathological scientists gaslight their critics into nonpersonhood.
Before one can cure Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, one must treat the sociopathic science which has fostered its cover-up.
The sociopathological system of CFS/AIDS apartheid pseudoscience is structured to maintain Anthony Fauci's power and control.
AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome pseudoscience was a sociopathic trainwreck.
Racist and homophobic nosology and epidemiology are forms of sociopathic science.
When the AIDS epidemic began, the CDC authorities studied the gay community the way a sociopath studies its easy mark.
Sociopathic science is the corrupted hard drive of HHV-6, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and AIDS research.
When scientists work cooperatively inside of sociopathic scientific systems they become mini-sociopaths.
Sociopathic science and medicine are crimes against humanity.
Sociopathic science is capable of creating public health gulags full of clueless patsies.
The Centers for Disease Control cannot do Chronic Fatigue Syndrome research in earnest because it would expose the sociopathic science that is the foundation of AIDS research.
If the words "sociopathic science" can set up camp in the discourse on CFS and AIDS research (and activism) the whole house of cards could eventually come down.
Anyone who doesn't see that AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome are intertwined has been hoodwinked by sociopathic science.
When scientists work cooperatively inside a culture of sociopathic science like CFS/AIDS, they must become its enablers and mini-sociopaths.
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is no mystery for anyone who understands the nature of sociopathic science.
The AIDS scientific sociopaths paved the way for the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome scientific sociopaths.
All the problems in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome research stem from the fact that is part of sociopathic science's corrupt AIDS bubble.
As the AIDS research establishment's fraud and deceit is exposed, it will respond with the rage of the typical sociopath.
Fauci, the NIH and CDC have gaslighted all their AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome whistleblowers.
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients need to lose their propensity for obedience and authoritarian awe of corrupt elites if they hope to escape from the labyrinth of sociopathic science.
Anthony Fauci's empire of sociopathic science has created a world in which Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients would rather die that admit that he has successfully hidden the fact that AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome are part of the same epidemic.
There must be a massive intellectual and political intervention to dismantle the sociopathic science of CFS/AIDS apartheid. People will never see the corrupt forest for what it is if activists and scientists focus on individual trees.
Historians will never fully grasp the nature of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome without comprehending the sociopathic science that has prevented everyone from seeing what is really happening.
Sociopathic science is blinded by narcissistic bigotry and a determination to remain in control. The sociopathic science of CFS/AIDS apartheid is blinded by racism and homophobia. Because sociopathic science treats gays and blacks as "the other," it lacks the empathy to see AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome as one epidemic. In The Sociopath Next Door, Martha Stout concludes that their lives do not end well. Sociopaths in power can cause their own destruction as well as the destruction of nations. That seems to be also be the destiny of the conscience-free sociopathic science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. It apparently is no secret that one of the leading scientists involved in the sociopathic science of AIDS research now has a son with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
Epidemiology and nosology that projects us-versus-them values on epidemics and blinds the public to facts is sociopathic science.
Sociopathic science is a form of pseudoscience which is driven by a systemic political, cultural and social desire to win at all costs. It has no remorse or empathy for its victims. It hides behind a mask of sympathy. It does not care about factuality or the messy and critical process of getting to the truth. It puts itself above truth. It is a sinister act of social will posing as concern for the public good.
In describing a sociopath, Martha Stout writes, "Imagine--if you can--not having a conscience, none at all, no feeling of guilt or remorse no matter what you do, no limiting sense of concern for the well-being of strangers, friends or even family members." She could just as easily have been writing about the sociopathic science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
In terms of public health and human rights, the sociopathic science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome has been and will be as consequential as Nazi science and medicine.
If one cannot do a thought experiment and imagine science itself becoming a sociopath, one will never fully understand AIDS, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and all the diseases related to the HHV-6 pandemic.
One cannot really confront the evil of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome pseudoscience unless one realizes one is dealing with a system of science that essentially is a sociopath.
Like a true sociopath, official AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome will not respond to normal events and research that usually correct false science and bring it back to its senses.
The main constituent elements of the sociopathic science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome apartheid are homophobia and racism.
Homophobia and racism are inherently sociopathic. They treat gays and blacks as "the other," as objects to be manipulated.
AIDS epidemiology and science had gays in their crosshairs.
The other is not considered fully human, so sociopathic science can do whatever it wants with its "others." Where AIDS is concerned, that would be gays and blacks.
Sociopathic science gets away with what it does because it maintains the appearance of "science."
For the most part, gays and blacks were clueless that they were dealing with science that was and is a sociopath. This was also true for the mostly white heterosexuals who were told they suffered from "mysterious Chronic Fatigue Syndrome."
AIDS epidemiology never treated gays and blacks as fully human.
Since AIDS epidemiology was fundamentally sociopathic, it could treat gays and blacks the way a cat treats a mouse. And it did.
Sociopathic science walks and and talks like science. It is very good at its charade.
Like most marks or patsies, gays and blacks for most part did not realize they had been targeted by a sociopath called AIDS epidemiology.
White heterosexuals who had the misfortune to be swept up into the fraudulent diagnosis of "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome" were the collateral damage of the sociopathic epidemiology of AIDS which was primarily aimed at gays and blacks.
Martha Stout points out that it is common for us to assume that everyone has a conscience, but that at least four percent of the population totally lacks one. The same holds true for the average person's take on science and medicine. It is nearly impossible for most people to get their minds around the idea that science and medicine can operate without a conscience."
Matha Stout describes sociopaths as having "ice water in their veins." The CDC's AIDS and CFS science had the same ice water in its veins.
Like the "internal constraints" to doing evil which the sociopath lacks, sociopathic science also is missing the barriers that keeps it from creating great evil. It does what it wants with a devil-may-care attitude. Sociopathic science does not lose sleep over anything it does.
During the era of CFS/AIDS apartheid, sociopathic science has been a steamroller that has flattened anyone who got in its way.
Martha Stout notes that the sociopath loves to destroy those who are superior "in some way." The sociopathic science behind CFS/AIDS apartheid sociopathically destroyed many a talented scientist and intellectual. Or at least tried to. It will fall to psychological historians to sort out how much envy figured into the scientific sociopathy of the era.
People wonder why there was no internal protest coming out of the CDC and NIH during the period of CFS/AIDS apartheid. The radio silence was a symptom of the underlying sociopathy.
Sociopathic science requires savvy political action to be undermined successfully.
Stout notes that terrorism is the "ideal occupation" for a sociopath. CDC epidemiology is not a bad one either. Malice and "blood Lust" can be concealed behind the mask of "objective" public health science.
Stout argues that sociopaths are "dangerously" insane. the same could be said for the pseudoscience of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
Science and medicine are the last place one expects to find sociopathy, so they are the perfect cover.
AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome science at the CDC was the institutional equivalent of an antisocial personality disorder.
Trout notes that antisocial personality disorder consists of "failure to conform to social norms." The science of AIDS and CFS failed to conform to scientific norms. The characteristics of "deceitfulness and manipulativity" typical of the antisocial personality, according to Trout, can also be found in AIDS and CFS science. The antisocial personality's "failure to plan ahead" is reflected in precarious trajectory that AIDS and CFS was always on while trying to appear solid and normal. There is no way to plan for the train wreck that this massive fraud is careening towards. Curiously, those who have observed the various acolytes or enablers of AIDS and CFS scientific fraud, have often commented upon something which Trout describes in the antisocial personality as "irritability and aggressiveness." The elements of "reckless disregard for the safety of self and others" as well as "consistent irresponsibility" are also good fits. AIDS and CFS scientists endangered their own lives and the lives of their families and friends by their misguided actions.
Sociopathic science means never having to say you're sorry while heading over a cliff.
Sociopathic science is a social, cultural, political and scientific disorder.
The parallel to the charm and glibness Martha Stout describes in a sociopath is the constant stream of breakthrough propaganda which makes the public trust sociopathic science. The constant sense of progress makes the public and the media look the other way.
An aura of holy objectivity fools the public into bowing its head while sociopathic science picks its pocket.
Sociopathic science constantly takes the risk that someone will successfully call out its frauds. But it also knows how to gaslight its whistle blowers.
The public does not have a clue about the risks that sociopathic CDC science is taking with their health. They don't even recognize the "callousness" that Stout says is part of the constellation of sociopathy. They are egregiously harmed without realizing it.
We expect there to be some kind of good faith, a soul, at the heart of public health science and yet with sociopathic science, like the sociopath as described by Stout, there is "an empty hole in the psyche" of the scientific system in which AIDS and CFS patients are trapped.
People who sense that something is wrong with sociopathic science can't always put their finger on what is really going on. They are befuddled.
If people do realize that the science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is "off" in some way, they are usually "gaslighted," made to feel like they are crazy, or are accused of being so. That is the price they initially pay for recognizing sociopathy in a person or in science.
Martha Stout points out that it is difficult for even smart people to get their minds around the concept of a human sociopath. How much harder muts it be for people of average intelligence to see that they are trapped in a matrix of sociopathic science.
The sociopathic science that is hiding the true nature of the CFS/AIDS and HHV-6 pandemic seems to be utterly heartless and only committed to maintaining its public health hegemony.
The image of the guiltlessness of sociopathic science might even be easier to maintain than the illusion of guiltlessness of a human sociopath. Science can hide its lies under the pretense of perpetual progress. Science likes to keep people from looking backward at its messy process even when it is not sociopathic. That is, a trail of lies can be called a trail of sausage-making that the public should not pay much attention to anyway.
Science can always insist that it had good intentions because nobody ever thinks that science could possibly have bad intentions. Except of course people who lived through Nazi Germany and the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, to name two exceptions.
Stout asserts that sociopathy causes no "discomfort to the sociopath. The same could be true to those who make the trains of sociopathic science run on time.
Stout writes that sociopaths "are all too capable of mangling individual lives; and of making human society as a whole an unsafe place to be." It was ever thus in the sociopathic science of AIDS, CFS and HHV-6. Life inside a covered-up plague is a very unsafe place to be.
One could say that consciencelessness and censorship are intertwined in sociopathic science. Critical thinking normally serves and a wake-up call of conscience in science. A war against dissent and critical thinking, as there was in CFS/AIDS apartheid, was a symptom of systematic sociopathology.
Where AIDS is concerned, the psychology and sociology of sociopathic science is intertwined with the psychology and sociology of gay stigma.
Anyone who thinks that when the CDC's mostly white male heterosexuals constructed the epidemiological paradigm of AIDS they were being objective about the gay community and the epidemic is sadly mistaken. They do not understand how hegemonic heterosexuality rolls and the degree to which public health science is infused with it.
The scientists who created the AIDS paradigm and kept Chronic Fatigue Syndrome at a distance from it did not leave their sexual and racial identity in the parking lot of the CDC.
Gays were "the other" to the white heterosexual male epidemiologists who created the epidemiological paradigm of AIDS which was both a Potemkin Village and a hell on earth.
The CDC may have declared its love for the gay community but to the close observer it was more like slumming. Sexual and biomedical slumming.
It is hard not to assume that the ideation that was at work in the early AIDS nosology and epidemiology was free of "distancing" and "stigma."
The CDC's term "AIDS risk group" was just a polite way of saying "faggot," "queer," or "nigger." The people called the "AIDS risk group" didn't realize that they were being epidemiologically mocked.
The militant idea that what the CDC scientists saw in AIDS could not affect them is what gave the age of sociopathic scientific fraud its determination to win at all costs. To let go of that lie would have caused an institutional nervous breakdown. Like the human sociopath, this sociopathic system needed a constant flow of lies to protect previous lies. That is what made AIDS and CFS look so much like a Ponzi scheme.
Like the human sociopath, what was missing from the sociopathic science of AIDS and CFS was what Martha Stout describes as "an intervening sense of obligation based on emotional attachments--including most especially love, compassion and tenderness."
One could say that the CDC epidemiologists created an AIDS and CFS paradigms based on their singular concern for themselves and their medical and social safety and self-esteem.
Sociopathic science is the glue that held AIDS and CFS fraud together.
The Centers for Disease Control is the perfect place for sociopathic science to blossom because it is the last place most people expect to find it.
Consciencelessness in science is reflected in a belligerent refusal to listen to the internal warnings that normally bring science back to its senses: new information, challenging data, possible new paradigms, anomalies, surprises, etc.
Martha Stout notes that conscience "blows whistles against institutions when lives are endangered." Sociopathic science creates the white noise that makes the sound of those whistles disappear.
According to Martha Stout, a sociopath has the ability to hide the "emptiness of his heart--and to command the passive silence of those who do know." There are more than a few people in AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome research who have come face-to-face with the empty heart of sociopathic science and entered into the realm of "passive silence."
The science of AIDS has always maintained appearances. It always looks like it is making progress because those in control of it also control the flow of information without having to answer to a skeptical or critical press. Negative information rarely gets published in science in general. Experiments are not regularly subjected to replication and when things are not replicated, they don't often result in publication. This works to the benefit of the sociopathic science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. There was not a more confidant face for all of this than that of Tony Fauci.
Martha Stout writes that the sociopath is "brilliant at winning. He can dominate. He can bind others to his will." This is totally true of The sociopathic science of AIDS with Anthony Fauci at its helm.
According to Martha Stout, the sociopath can cause "otherwise sophisticated people to jump and then laugh at them behind their backs." The list of sophisticated people who have jumped when they come face-to-face with the sociopathic science of the CDC, Tony Fauci and Bob Gallo is painfully long. And the laughter was shared by the sociopathic AIDS activists who acted as the storm troopers and street thugs for the sociopathic science of AIDS.
Like a true sociopath, as described by Martha Stout, the sociopathic science of AIDS and CFS could "frighten people" and "ruin a career." People don't realize that sociopathic science is playing games with them.
About the sociopath, Stout points out that "Strategies and payoffs are the only thrill he knows . . . and he has spent his entire life getting better at the game." It was ever thus for Anthony Fauci and the sociopathic AIDS and CFS science he fostered.
Martha Stout describes a sociopath as someone who treats others as "nothing more than game pieces, to be moved about, used as shields, or ejected." That's all gays and blacks ultimately were in the world of sociopathic AIDS/CFS science: game pieces.
A sociopath often has murder in his heart. You could say that the epidemiology that produced the AIDS paradigm and excluded Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, had a kind murder in its heart. Epidemiology can easily become murderous without anyone realizing what is going on. She writes, "Perhaps the ultimate in dominating another person is to take another life." Epidemiology can do much broader and deeper damage. It can take the lives of entire communities of people.
Anyone who has stared into the abyss of the sociopathic science that constitutes AIDS and Chronic Fatigue pseudoscience knows what Martha Stout means when she writes, "We are all shaken to our core by the knowledge that in our midst there are sociopathic monsters who can kill without passion or remorse."
Concealment is very important for sociopathic people and sociopathic science. Stout notes that human sociopaths "can remain unidentified for long periods of time."
Every sociopathic deception about Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is connected to a sociopathic deception about AIDS.
Sociopathic science knows how to game research and public health by quashing dissent, ignoring challenges to its logic, and promoting propaganda. It understands the levers of power in science.
Martha Stout notes, "It seems to us the ultimate injustice that a person could be evil, by our assessment, and still feel fine about itself." Sociopathic science always feels hunky-dory.
In many ways even nonsociopathic science is wired to never have to have qualms about things that go wrong because it just keeps moving. Sociopathic science takes advantage of this appearance of always moving forward to keep people from questioning its actions or motives. Science comes with a kind of built-in plausible deniability that is very useful for sociopathology. But frankly, AIDS and CFS fraud was anything but an honest mistake. It was always malice-infused. Sociopathic science is much like the human sociopaths described by Martha Stout who are "infamous for their refusal to acknowledge responsibility for the decisions they make or for the outcomes of their decisions."
Peel away the propagandistic surface of AIDS epidemiology and research and you will find what Martha Stout calls the "outrageous" logic of the sociopath.
Martha Stout tells us that when one tries to peer into the sociopath, one is looking into emptiness. The same could be said for AIDS and CFS science as conducted by the CDC. There is no there there.
Some very awesome people with consciences tried to take on the sociopathic science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome but they had to be destroyed because as Martha Stout notes, "What sociopaths envy, and may seek to destroy as part of the game is usually something in the character of a person with conscience and strong characters are often specifically targeted by sociopaths."
People with weak characters who are easily influenced make the perfect useful idiots for sociopathic science.
.
Homophobia and racism drove the sociopathic science of AIDS and CFS, but its consequences were not limited to gay and blacks.
White heterosexuals were the collateral damage of the homophobic and racist sociopathic science of AIDS and CFS.
There is no real empathetic heart beating with love for the gay and black victims of the sociopathic science of AIDS and CFS.
One could say that sociopathic science has a blood lust for doing nosology and epidemiology on outsiders, pariahs, others, minorities, the folks on the other side of the tracks.
Paradigm shifts in nonsociopathic science are supposed to be fun and exhilarating. Paradigm shifts out of sociopathic science are bloody and anything but fun.
Martha Stout asserts that sociopaths treat others as "its." The gay and black communities became the "its" of the Fauci/NIH/CDC empire of sociopathic science. Whatever modicum of conscience presence in the architects of the sociopathic science of AIDS and CFS was directed at their own friends and families. And sometimes not even them They put the whole world at risk, family and friends included.
When you are the target of a sociopath, according to Martha Stout, "You are excluded from my moral universe and with impunity--and maybe even praise from others in my group--I can drive you from your home, or shoot your family, or burn you alive." Sociopathic epidemiology allows a majority to bestow pariah status on a a minority group and inflect them medically with what could be called "Iatrogenocide."
Martha Stout warns that when sociopaths rule, the conscience of society can fall "into a profound trance" until brave, aware and moral leaders awaken people to their better senses. Unfotunately, the sociopathic science of AIDS and CFS was not successfully challenged by such leadership.
Sociopathic science was used to craft an epidemiological message that Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is not part of the AIDS epidemic.
Martha Stout writes that when sociopathological beliefs takes over a society, the results can be disastrous: "Once these beliefs have been disseminated, crushing the 'its" without pity or conscience can, with chilling ease, become an incontrovertible mandate." The beauty of the AIDS paradigm is that the "its" don't have a clue they are being hoodwinked and treated as "its."
Gays became the risk group "its" of the sociopathic science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. they got no help or critical thinking from the public. Something Martha Stout writes about sociopathology applies here: "One explanation is our trance-like state, which lets us believe the ones who are dying are only its anyway."
Sociopathological science has turned Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients into "stigma beneficiaries" of the anti-gay, Jim Crow epidemiology of AIDS. Their health may be have been seriously neglected, but at least they were not caught up in he CDC's AIDS risk group dragnet. They were in hell without a scarlet letter.
When scientific authority becomes sociopathic, we are in dire straits because, as Martha Stout points out, "we are programmed to obey authority even against our own consciences."
The sociopathic science of AIDS and CFS is able to hide behind the mask of legitimate authority created by Fauci and the CDC.
Science is often a very authoritarian culture posing as a very unauthoritarian one. Especially when it is sociopathic.
Science's sociopathic potential for fascism hides behind the appearance of a democratic process that is often anything but democratic. That science supposedly plays by the rules is the cover story for something that can be far more complicated and sinister.
In her book on sociopathology, Martha Stout writes that authority can "dull conscience." Sociopathic science has an uncanny ability to wield its authority to "dull conscience."
Sociopathic CDC AIDS science had to construct a series of risk groups of "its" to conceal the real epidemic that included what they almost facetiously referred to as "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome."
AIDS propaganda prevented the gay and black communities from seeing that they were victims of sociopathic science.
The separation of the AIDS and Chronic fatigue Syndrome epidemics was one of American science's most sociopathic enterprises.
The gay and Black communities did not have a clue that AIDS science was actually a sociopathic war of fraud being waged against them.
Sociopathic AIDS science needs to frame itself as "good" so any criticism of it can be attacked as "evil." It has worked for decades.
Contemporary sociopathic science takes advantage of the esoteric nature of modern science to trick to distract its victims from fundamental fraud.
The treatment of the truthtellers and whistleblowers who tried to expose the fraudulent nature of the science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome resembled the treatment that the victims of what Martha Stout calls "covetous" sociopaths receive. Stout writes, "Since it is simply not possible to steal and have for oneself the most valuable possessions of another person--beauty, intelligence, success, a strong character--the covetous sociopath settles for besmirching or damaging enviable qualities in others so they will not have them either, or at least not be able to enjoy them so much." In a number of ways the people who went up against Fauci and his gang had superior intelligence and character, but Fauci had the power and knew how to game the system against his moral and intellectual betters. It will fall to historians to try and sort out all the strands of covetous sociopathology that found their way into the pseudoepidemiology and pseudoscience of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
Thee were not two different kinds of sociopathology involved in AIDS and CFS. They are intertwined.
Insofar as gays live in a heterosexist culture, it should not surprise anyone that the sociopathic epidemiology of the CDC would put them in its crosshairs. To expect otherwise now seems almost goofy. Martha Stout points out, "Retribution usually against people who have no idea that they have been targeted is the most important activity in the covetous sociopath's life. . . . Since this clandestine power game is priority number one, all of the covetous sociopath's deceitfulness and tolerance for risk are devoted to it."
Given that AIDS and CFS science are basically sociopathic, one is elated to hear from Stout that sociopaths are "self destructive." But even if the sociopathic science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ultimately implodes, decade of human carnage are its legacy.
Martha Stout basically suggests that the best sociopaths are surrounded by people who are unaware about what is going on. The same could be said for sociopathic science.
Sociopathic science can become so axiomatic that people are not aware that up has been turned into down.
Martha Stout writes, "We do not expect to see a person direct a dangerous, vicious vendetta against someone who in most cases has done nothing to hurt or offend her." We also did not expect the CDC to basically conduct an heterosexist epidemiological vendetta against the gay and black communities in their hour of need.
Homophobia and racism are inherently sociopathic. Homophobic and racist epidemiology is inherently sociopathic.
Martha Stout describes a sociopath as someone who "has been slighted by nature, circumstances, and destiny, and . . . diminishing other people is [his or her] only means of being powerful." In some ways you could say that lowbrow and not very important CDC epidemiologists and scientists who got engaged in the AIDS epidemic came in contact with people in need who were in many ways their betters and that may have created the desire to diminish them with all the tricks in the arsenal of pseudoepidemiology and pseudoscience.
Gays and blacks didn't have a clue that they were being sociopathologically targeted by epidemiological retribution.
Martha Stout discusses the "gratuitous meanness' of sociopaths in her book. Anyone who came in touch with the entrenched AIDS elite notices that about them too. There was also a "gratuitous meanness" in the AIDS activist leadership. CFS patients also noticed it in their encounters with the CDC.
Stout writes that the "true nature" of a sociopath "is usually invisible to the group." It is totally the case with sociopathic science. She says that the sociopath is "a wolf in sheep's clothing" and what they do is "an extravagant charade." This describes AIDS pseudoscience perfectly. Science that is sociopathic looks normal but is anything but.
Stout asserts that sociopaths "secretly sabotage" their victims. For over three decades gays and Blacks were secretly sabotaged by AIDS sociopathic science.
Stout notes that sociopaths often use fear tactics and that is very true of the sociopathic science of AIDS and CFS. She says that sociopaths do everything they can to destroy their victims faith in themselves. Sociopathic science has an arsenal of weapons to use in browbeating its victims and making them question their ability to see the scientific truth for themselves.
Like sociopaths, who Martha Stout says have "diminishing other lives" as their primary goal. You could say that the sociopathic science of Anthony Fauci and the CDC diminished the lives of the gay and black communities. And of course, the victims often can't even tell that they are being diminished. For three decades they have played the role of totally cooperative patsies.
When someone comes face to face with sociopathic science they often doubt themselves and think, "This can't be really happening." But it is. In this way sociopathological science and actually destabilizes a persons sense of reality. Logic can disappear and in its place an Alice-in-Wonderland world of fraud has claimed the place of what once was reality.
The parallel to the charm of the human sociopath in sociopathic science is the built-in charisma of normal science which can be easily hijacked by sociopathic science.
Martha Stout says that sociopaths like to take risks. You could say that the sociopathic science of AIDS and CFS has taken risks that puts the credibility of American science and medicine in all kinds of jeopardy. The consequences could be exponential. The sociopathic science of AIDS has sucked many scientists into its vortex. Their careers are now at risk.
The sociopathic science of AIDS had a brilliant understanding of the psychological vulnerabilities of its victims.
Martha Stout asserts a human sociopath "can instantly recognize someone who is decent and trusting." In the gay and black communities the sociopathic science of Fauci and the CDC found its victims who were decent and trusting.
Martha Stout points out that a trademark of sociopaths is "crocodile tears." The sociopathic era of AIDS fraud was based in crocodile tears. Bullying crocodile tears.
Stout says the sociopaths "adopt a position of righteous indignation and anger in an attempt to stare off [the] accuser." The scientists who promoted the sociopathic science of AIDS and their activist enablers were masters of righteous indignation and anger.
Science can be a perfect mask for sociopathology. Stout writes, "conscienceless people can make full use of social and professional roles, which constitute ready-made masks that other people are loathe to look behind." People could never believe that a massive amount of fraud was coming out of the professional mouths of Fauci and the CDC.
When one thinks about the CDC's sociopathological epidemiological and scientific power, one is reminded of something Benjamin Wolman said (and Martha Stout quotes), "Usually human cruelty increases when an aggressive sociopath gains an uncanny, almost hypnotic control over numbers of people."
The sociopathological science of AIDS knew how to manipulate the propaganda levers of "credibility" and to strip it from its critics.
When sociopathological science fools a majority of people, the minority may begin to doubt their own perceptions.
People find it hard to believe that the Centers for Disease Control has been behaving like a sociopath for over 35 years.
Scientists pretend that science is inherently objective and moral. It can easily become subjective, immoral and sociopathological.
Throughout the AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome cover-up of HHV-6, science has been authoritarian and sociopathological.
Martha Stout writes, "Until recent centuries, we raised humans for whom moral outrage was an extreme luxury, and to whom the questioning of authority felt life threatening." In the socioathic world of AIDS research, questioning authority was career-threatening. And worse."
The AIDS and CFS patients have been gaslighted into not daring to challenge the sociopathic authority that they have been victimized by.
Science that will absolutely not alter itself when it is faced with contradictory evidence due to poiltics and power relationships is sociopathic.
Sociopathic AIDS pseudoscience is malevolent and malicious.
Everywhere you look in the HHV-6 cover-up you will find the sociopathological footprints of homophobia and racism.
Martha Stout writes, "To do something about shameless people, we must first identify them." Unfortunately, because sociopathic science has so many different levers of power, the public cannot even identify it as sociopathic. It just looks like normal science.
There is a great deal of pity-seeking in the AIDS era. Stout notes that sociopaths play a game in which the look for pity. The nature of the AIDS epidemic and the nature of sociopathoogy became intertwined in the arena of AIDS science and activism. Power went to the activists who hid behind he mask of pity-seeking. It is hard to believe that a group of people you are pitying are playing Machiavellian games.
Sociopathic AIDS scientists want to be pitied when they are attacked by critics who see what they are really doing. How could anybody question our honesty when we are doing such lifesaving work! We've put our own lives in danger. How dare anybody doubt us!
A sociopath, according to Martha Stout, tries "to make other people look smaller so that [he or she] can feel bigger." One could say that the heterosexist and racist male epidemiology of AIDS had the same agenda toward the gay and black communities.
Gays and blacks were victims of a white heterosexual CDC epidemiology that truly could not emotionally connect with them.
CDC AIDS pseudo-epidemiology and pseudoscience is the ultimate white heterosexual privilege.
Martha Stout writes that the sociopath transforms their life into a lie. They are capable of tormenting "the helpless for the thrill of making [his or her] colleagues look bad, and all without the slightest blip of embarrassment or accountability."
Like a human sociopath as described by Stout, sociopathic science is "deceitful, reckless, faithless and remorseless."
Science can't become sociopathic without help from some actual human sociopaths. But once the system becomes sociopathic, every element of it is supportive.
One could say that initially the CDC's AIDS science was based on a white male heterosexual "lovelessness" for gays and blacks, but as the fraudulent diagnosis of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome became necessary to cover up what they had done in AIDS, a rampant misogyny took over.
Anyone who observes the self-importance that the CDC seems to always glow with, knows that it is a very narcissistic organization. And Stout writes, "Narcissism is in a metaphorical sense one half of what sociopathy is." She also writes, "The poor narcissist cannot see past his own nose, emotionally speaking." Ditto for sociopathic science.
A lot of the first doctors and scientists involved in the AIDS epidemics saw a chance for career advancement. They were perfect recruits for sociopathic science.
Normal science is full of propagandistic charm. The public is fascinated, adoring, grateful. They make the perfect patsies when science turns sociopathic.
Sociopathic AIDS science has reigned supreme for the last 35 or so years. It is interesting that Martha Stout asserts, "Disturbingly the prevalence of sociopathy in he United Stares seems to be increasing."
Knowing that we are in the middle of an HHV-6 pandemic which infects and affects people's brains, it is fascinating that she notes that from 1976-1991, "the prevalence of antisocial personality disorder had nearly doubled among the young in America."
Stout argues that the sociopath plays a game of domination. As of now, the CDC has won it dirty game of domination against the gay and black communities. And all the victims of HHV-6 disease.
The patsies who didn't question the sociopathic AIDS science that victimized them hated the non-patsies who did question it or refused to cooperate with the authorities. This resembles what feminists called "horizontal hostility."
In her book, The Sociopath Next Door, Martha Stout urges people to get away from human sociopaths as quickly as possible. Unfortunately for the gay and black communities, there was no escape from the sociopathic epidimiology and science of he CDC and Anthony Fauci.
If science has something akin to a social contract, it is completely destroyed when it becomes sociopathological.
Without a social conscience, science can stray into the domain of pure evil.
A community of beleaguered gays who were prone, in their vulnerability, to conform to group norms, were especially susceptible to the machinations of sociopathic AIDS science and activism.
Knowing what happens in the world to human sociopaths, it should not surprise us that sociopathic science of AIDS has been so successful. Stout writes, "It would be difficult to refute the observation that people who are completely unhampered by conscience sometimes achieve power and wealth at least for a while."
Martha Stout conclude that sociopaths, big and small "most typically come to no good end. . . . In the final analysis, sociopaths appear to be a losing game, regardless of its scale." Hopefully this will be the case with the sociopathic science of AIDS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
One of the most disturbing thing about human sociopaths, according to Martha Stout is that we "do not recognize them until after they damage humanity in unfathomable ways." Historians will be sorting out what sociopathic AIDS and CFS science have done to humanity for many decades.
Stout asserts that sociopaths generally "are on a downward life course" and have "failed lives." One could say that the sociopathic science of AIDS and CFS is totally failed science. It is failed science posing right now as great science.
To be continued at Sociopathic Science University . . .
